Guido has news that Lord S’ralan Sugar, he of the “pissin’ my bladdy money up the wall” decorum, is sending threatening letters to political commentator Quentin Letts, who made some more than usually ascerbic observations on a radio programme.
Threatening libel against journos is really only a last resort – Guildford Tory councillor Cllr Tony Rooth once hinted strongly that he would sue me if I printed a story about him at the Surrey Advertiser. I knew the story was true (and he can’t sue for my saying that because I haven’t made the allegation on here) but I couldn’t prove it, so I had to drop it. I never liked him much after that.
And that’s the thing with libel – once you show that you don’t have a thick skin, whatever follows on from that point will always be viewed in a lesser light. Mr Letts’s assertion was that Sugar only got his job through being a TV celebrity and that he wasn’t of great intellectual capacity.
To my mind, that’s fair comment, even if it would be difficult to secure a justification defence here. But on the second point, I think there’s a tacit agreement defence too – Sugar has readily said on the Apprentice that he values street smarts over book smarts and that he’s survived and prospered on shrewdness rather than intellect.
I always quite liked Sugar because of his connection with Spurs and his entertaining persona on the TV. With all the success, profile and money he could want, his threatening to sue seems churlish, bullying and self-important. I’m not sure I like him much now, either.
